one of the most complex military maneuvers of all time was the allied invasion of europe by way of the normandy beaches of northern france. the carefully orchestrated invasion essential to the defeat of hitler. the supreme allied commander, who was general dwight d. eisenhower. later to become president of the united states. the invasion took place on june 6, 1944. the weather so terrible that the invasion was delayed for a full day. american troops landing on utah beach. encountered only mild resistance at first. in contrast, the landing at omaha beach much more treacherous. the coast itself was extremely dangerous, the landing took place too far off shore, and the germans had double the forces at this site. other allied forces the british and the canadians. military cemeteries for the fallen americans, canadians, and british in normandy. in arromanches, the arromanches 360° and landing museum commemorates d-day. with video of the invasion and france today surrounding the spectators. which option(s) below would be an acceptable revision of the selection in bold?
- in arromanches, the arromanches 360° and landing museum commemorates d-day with video of the invasion and france today surrounding the spectators.
- video of the invasion and france today surrounds the spectators.
- both revisions are acceptable
- no revision is necessary

Question

Accepted Answer

# Brief Explanations:
The original bolded sentence is a fragment. The first option revises it to make a complete sentence by connecting "commemorates D - Day" with "with video...", creating a grammatically correct sentence. The second option is a complete sentence on its own, but it loses the context of the museum commemorating D - Day. However, the question is about acceptable revisions of the bolded part. The first option properly integrates the bolded part into the sentence about the museum, making it a complete and correct sentence. The second option is a complete sentence but doesn't relate to the museum context as the original (and the first revision) does. Wait, no—actually, the bolded part is "With video of the invasion and France today surrounding the spectators." The first option moves that phrase to be part of the sentence about the museum, making the sentence "In Arromanches, the Arromanches 360° and Landing Museum commemorates D - Day with video of the invasion and France today surrounding the spectators," which is a complete sentence. The second option is a standalone sentence, but it doesn't include the museum context. But the question is about revising the bolded part. The original bolded part is a fragment. The first option incorporates it into the main clause about the museum, making a complete sentence. The second option is a complete sentence but changes the subject (now the video and France today are the subject, not the museum). But the question is which revisions of the bolded part are acceptable. The first option revises the bolded part to be part of a complete sentence (attaching it to the museum's action), so it's acceptable. The second option is a complete sentence but doesn't include the museum, so it's not a revision of the bolded part in the context of the original sentence. Wait, maybe I misread. Let's re - examine: The original sentence before bold is "In Arromanches, the Arromanches 360° and Landing Museum commemorates D - Day. With video of the invasion and France today surrounding the spectators." The bolded part is a fragment. The first option combines the two sentences into one: "In Arromanches, the Arromanches 360° and Landing Museum commemorates D - Day with video of the invasion and France today surrounding the spectators," which is a correct, complete sentence. The second option is "Video of the invasion and France today surrounds the spectators," which is a complete sentence but doesn't mention the museum. But the question is about revising the bolded part. The bolded part is a dependent clause - like fragment. The first option makes it part of the main sentence, so it's an acceptable revision. The second option is a different sentence, not a revision of the bolded part in the context of the original sentence structure. Wait, maybe the options are about revising the bolded fragment. So the first option is an acceptable revision as it makes the sentence complete by attaching the fragment to the main clause. The second option is a complete sentence but doesn't relate to the museum. But the question is which option(s) is an acceptable revision of the bolded selection. So the first option is acceptable. Wait, but let's check grammar. The original bolded part is a fragment. The first option integrates it into the sentence about the museum, so "commemorates D - Day with video..." is correct. The second option is a complete sentence, but it's a different sentence, not a revision of the bolded part (which is part of the museum - related sentence). So only the first option is acceptable? Wait, no—maybe the second option is a revision that stands on its own, but the question is about revising the bolded part. The bolded part is "With video...", so the first option uses that phrase as part of the museum's action, making a complete sentence. The second option is a sentence with the video and France today as the subject, but it's a complete sentence. But the original context is about the museum. However, the question is about acceptable revisions of the bolded part. So the first option is an acceptable revision (turning the fragment into part of a complete sentence), the second option is a complete sentence but changes the subject. But maybe the answer is the first option. Wait, let's re - read the options:

Option 1: "In Arromanches, the Arromanches 360° and Landing Museum commemorates D - Day with video of the invasion and France today surrounding the spectators." This is a complete sentence, combining the two original sentences (the one about the museum and the fragment) into one, using the bolded part as a prepositional phrase to describe how the museum commemorates D - Day.

Option 2: "Video of the invasion and France today surrounds the spectators." This is a complete sentence, but it doesn't include the museum context. However, the question is about revising the bolded part. The bolded part is a fragment. Option 1 revises it to be part of a complete sentence (related to the museum), Option 2 is a complete sentence but doesn't relate to the museum. But maybe the question considers that Option 1 is acceptable because it fixes the fragment by attaching it to the main clause, while Option 2 is also a complete sentence but is it a revision of the bolded part? The bolded part is "With video...", so Option 1 uses that phrase in a complete sentence, Option 2 is a different sentence. So the correct answer is the first option. Wait, but maybe I made a mistake. Let's check again. The original bolded part is a fragment. Option 1 makes it part of a complete sentence (the museum commemorates D - Day with...), which is correct. Option 2 is a complete sentence but doesn't have the museum, so it's not a revision of the bolded part in the context of the original sentence. So the acceptable revision is the first option.

# Answer:
A. In Arromanches, the Arromanches 360° and Landing Museum commemorates D - Day with video of the invasion and France today surrounding the spectators.

Sovi.AI - AI Math Tutor

QUESTION IMAGE

Question

Explanation:

Answer: