Question

miranda v. arizona
in 1966, the supreme court of the united states heard the case of miranda v. arizona, which changed the way law enforcement officers interact with suspects. this case is where the concept of “miranda rights” comes from, or the collection of rights that police officers must read to a suspect when they are arrested.
which of the following was established by the miranda v. arizona case?
the rights of citizens to keep and bear firearms
the right to privacy while not serving a public office
the right to be informed of rights during an arrest

Explanation:

The Miranda v. Arizona case established that suspects must be informed of their rights (like the right to an attorney, right to remain silent) during an arrest. The first option about the right to keep and bear arms is from the Second Amendment, the second about privacy in public office is unrelated. The third option matches the Miranda rights' requirement of informing suspects of their rights during arrest.

Answer:

the right to be informed of rights during an arrest