Question

jamar is writing an argumentative essay on whether or not public libraries should provide more digital books and resources. the counterclaim argues that \traditional printed books are more reliable and have a longer lifespan.\ which of the following is an effective rebuttal to this counterclaim? digital books are more expensive for libraries to acquire than printed books. digital resources are more accessible to a broader audience, including people with disabilities. libraries should prioritize physical books and limit access to digital resources. nobody even goes to libraries anymore anyway, so what does it matter?

Explanation:

A rebuttal should address the counterclaim's point (reliability/lifespan) by highlighting a positive aspect of digital books. The first option supports the counterclaim (costlier), the third option agrees with the counterclaim (prioritize physical), and the fourth is irrelevant (library visits). The second option shows digital resources' advantage (accessibility) which can counter the idea that printed books are better (as it provides a benefit printed books lack, thus challenging the counterclaim's superiority claim).

Answer:

Digital resources are more accessible to a broader audience, including people with disabilities.