Question

impacts of imperialism quick check
determine which of the following statements is a valid example of paternalism. (1 point)
the british government only allowed british officials, not trained indians, to hold positions in government.
the british government allowed indirect rule of nigeria by letting local leaders have more control.
the u.s. won the spanish - american war and claimed territories, such as guam and puerto rico.
the british east india company made trade agreements with the mughal empire.

Explanation:

Paternalism in imperialism is when the imperial power acts as a "parent" figure, making decisions for the colonized people under the guise of "knowing what's best." The statement about the British government only allowing British officials (not trained Indians) to hold government positions shows a mindset where the colonizers (British) think they are superior and know better than the colonized (Indians) about governance, even if Indians were trained. The other options:

• The British allowing local leaders more control in Nigeria (indirect rule) is more about a governance strategy (indirect rule) rather than paternalistic assumption of superiority in decision - making for all aspects.
• The U.S. claiming territories after a war is about territorial acquisition through war, not paternalism.
• The British East India Company making trade agreements is about economic interaction, not paternalistic governance assumptions.

Answer:

The British government only allowed British officials, not trained Indians, to hold positions in government.