Question

the hypothesis would not have been supported by the data if
○ traits independently assorted in approximately a 9:3:3:1 ratio.
○ the traits for white fur and red eyes were always inherited together.
○ all the f1 offspring had the same phenotype.

Explanation:

• Option 1: A 9:3:3:1 ratio is the classic Mendelian ratio for independent assortment, so this would support the hypothesis, not the opposite.
• Option 2: If white fur and red eyes were always inherited together, it would indicate linkage (genes on the same chromosome), which goes against the hypothesis of independent assortment (genes on different chromosomes assorting independently).
• Option 3: All F1 offspring having the same phenotype is expected in a cross between pure - breeding parents (e.g., P generation: AA BB × aa bb, F1: Aa Bb all with the same phenotype), which is in line with Mendelian genetics and does not refute the hypothesis.

Answer:

the traits for white fur and red eyes were always inherited together.