Question

of the following statements best explains the difference between the point and counterpoint authors views on cyberbullying?
the point article believes cyberbullying is taking an emotional toll on children, and the counterpoint article thinks it has been dealt with through anti - bullying
grams.
the point article thinks schools need more school programs dealing with cyberbullying, and the counterpoint article wants parents to better monitor it.
the point article calls for stricter laws against cyberbullying, and the counterpoint article thinks that the internet cannot be policed.
the point article does not think that cyberbullying is as dangerous as other forms of bullying, and the counterpoint article believes that all forms of bullying are
ual.
a: mo:6.ri.1a

Explanation:

To solve this, we analyze each option:

• Option A: If the Counterpoint article claimed cyberbullying is "dealt with" via anti - bullying programs, we need to check if this matches typical views. Usually, cyberbullying is still a prevalent issue, so this is unlikely.
• Option B: School programs vs. parental monitoring is a possible difference, but let's check other options.
• Option C: The Point advocating stricter laws (a common stance to combat cyberbullying) and the Counterpoint arguing the Internet can’t be policed (a realistic view about the challenges of policing online spaces) aligns well with typical arguments about cyberbullying.
• Option D: The idea that Point downplays cyberbullying’s danger while Counterpoint says all bullying is equal goes against common narratives (most recognize cyberbullying as dangerous).

Answer:

C. The Point article calls for stricter laws against cyberbullying, and the Counterpoint article thinks that the Internet cannot be policed.