Question

the fair housing act (1968) sought to eliminate discrimination in housing, demonstrating progress toward equality. however, its impact was limited by enforcement challenges discriminatory practices persisted, showing that the law fully achieved its intended goals made progress but required more action had no impact on discrimination

Explanation:

The Fair Housing Act (1968) aimed to end housing discrimination. However, discriminatory practices persisted, indicating the law made progress (since it sought to eliminate discrimination and there was some progress) but needed more action (as discrimination still existed). "Fully achieved its intended goals" is wrong as discrimination persisted. "Had no impact" is wrong as the act sought to eliminate discrimination and made progress. So the correct option is the one stating "made progress but required more action".

Answer:

made progress but required more action