Question

although most residents agree that running events continue to be popular and would be an enjoyable addition to our local community, some may fear that a half marathon would be an inconvenience because of traffic. however, a careful mapping of the 13.1 - mile course we need problems. the proposed route could be posted on the town’s website well ahead of time, and residents would have a week or two to voice any difficulties they see. such feedback would allow a committee adequate time to re - route the race if necessary. the recent experience with runners, residents, and drivers—will be satisfied. most importantly, by working together to become the most runner - friendly city in our region, we better exemplify our town’s motto: a happy, healthy place to live. why does the author include the phrase some may fear that a half marathon would be an inconvenience because of traffic in the editorial? 1. to anticipate and resolve a potential problem caused by the half marathon 2. to discredit the argument by showing it as an unlikely and unimportant concern 3. to emphasize and clarify the author’s position in reference to the half marathon 4. to appeal to the emotions of readers by focusing on the health benefits of running

Explanation:

The author includes the phrase about some fearing traffic inconvenience to address a potential concern (traffic issues) upfront and then explains how the route planning will resolve it (by posting info early, feedback for adjustments, etc.). Option 1 matches this as it's about anticipating and resolving a potential problem. Option 2 is wrong as the author doesn't discredit the concern but addresses it. Option 3: the phrase is about a concern, not emphasizing the author's position. Option 4: the phrase is about traffic inconvenience, not health benefits of running.

Answer:

1. to anticipate and resolve a potential problem caused by the half marathon