Question

after reading the article, your friends are interested in learning about the statistics/research on the effect of banning cell phones in educational settings. so, you watch the video titled grades improve when cell phones are banned, but experts say distraction is not the problem. how do the video and the article complement each other on the issue of cell phones in educational settings? the article attempts to convince the reader that cell phones should be banned, while the video attempts to convince the reader that cell phones should be allowed. the article only incorporates one point of view, while the video incorporates multiple points of view. both the article and the video incorporate multiple points of view on the issue. the article and the video dont relate to each other in any way.

Explanation:

The video title "Grades Improve When Cell Phones Are Banned, but Experts Say Distraction Is Not The Problem" implies multiple viewpoints (grades improve - but distraction not the problem). Articles on such topics also typically present multiple aspects (e.g., pros and cons, different expert opinions). So both likely incorporate multiple points of view.

Answer:

Both the article and the video incorporate multiple points of view on the issue.