Question

20 multiple choice 1 point
voluntary sterilization is the subject of many debates:
○ due to congressional objection.
○ due to the high of cost of the procedure.
○ due to objection by the state in which the person seeking an abortion resides.
○ as a result of religious, moral, and ethical issues.

21 multiple choice 1 point
in h.l v. matheson, the supreme court ruled that it is not an undue burden to require that:
○ a statute setting out a mere requirement of parental notice when possible does not violate the constitutional rights of an immature, dependent minor.
○ a woman be informed of the nature of the abortion procedure and the risks involved.
○ a woman be offered information on the fetus and on the alternatives to abortion.
○ a woman give her informed consent before the abortion procedure.

22 multiple choice 1 point
the supreme court reaffirmed the constitutional right of women to have an abortion before viability of the fetus, as first annunciated in roe v. wade, in:
○ h.l v. matheson.
○ harris v. mcrae.
○ planned parenthood v. casey.
○ bellotti v. baird.

Explanation:

Question 20

Voluntary sterilization debates are often tied to religious, moral, and ethical concerns (e.g., views on reproduction, bodily autonomy, religious teachings). Congressional objection, state abortion - related objection, or high cost are not the primary reasons for debates on voluntary sterilization.

In H.L. v. Matheson, the Supreme Court's ruling was about parental notice for minor's abortion. The other options relate to informed consent or information about abortion procedure/fetus, which are not the focus of this case.

Planned Parenthood v. Casey reaffirmed the right to abortion before fetal viability (from Roe v. Wade). H.L. v. Matheson is about parental notice, Harris v. McRae about funding, Bellotti v. Baird about minor's abortion rights, not reaffirming Roe's viability standard.

Answer:

D. as a result of religious, moral, and ethical issues.

Question 21