Question

1. how does the constitution divide power between the three branches?

power is not completely separated, allowing each branch to limit the other branches exercise of power.
power is completely separated, allowing each branch to act and follow through without interference from the other two branches.
power is separated, but in such a way that two branches can easily work together to out vote the efforts of the third branch to exercise its powers.
power is not clearly separated, so it is difficult to determine who has what power or check on the other branches.

Explanation:

The U.S. Constitution divides power among the three branches (legislative, executive, judicial) in a way that power is separated but not completely. This separation allows for a system of checks and balances. If power were completely separated (each branch acting without any interference from others), there would be no checks and balances. If power were not separated clearly, it would be hard to determine who has what power or check on others. The correct model is that power is separated but in such a way that two branches can work together to check the third. For example, the legislative (Congress) can pass a law, the executive (President) can veto it (check by executive on legislative), and Congress can override the veto with a 2/3 majority (check by legislative on executive). Also, the judicial branch can declare laws (legislative) or executive actions unconstitutional (checks by judicial on legislative and executive).

Answer:

Power is separated, but in such a way that two branches can easily work together to out - vote the efforts of the third branch to exercise its powers.