Question

why would the da choose not to prosecute an accused person? (choose all that apply)
if they believe they might lose the case.
if they had found exculpatory evidence.
they believe it is unethical to prosecute someone who may be innocent.
the evidence does not show proof \beyond a reasonable doubt\.
rewatch

Explanation:

• "If they believe they might lose the case": DAs may avoid prosecuting if they assess a low chance of winning, as losing can impact their record and resources.
• "If they had found exculpatory evidence": Exculpatory evidence proves the accused’s innocence, so a DA would not prosecute with such evidence.
• "They believe it is unethical to prosecute someone who may be innocent": Ethical considerations about wrongfully prosecuting the innocent can lead to declining prosecution.
• "The evidence does not show proof 'beyond a reasonable doubt'": The legal standard for conviction is proof beyond a reasonable doubt; if not met, prosecution is not pursued.

Answer:

A. If they believe they might lose the case.
B. If they had found exculpatory evidence.
C. They believe it is unethical to prosecute someone who may be innocent.
D. The evidence does not show proof "beyond a reasonable doubt".