Question

why are the courts so frequently asked to deal with controversial public policy issues?

both the executive and legislative branches of government prefer the judicial branch to make the decisions.

the issues in and of themselves are controversial.

the legislative branch does not write the laws well enough to avoid litigation.

the courts must interpret the vague language of constitutional limitations on government.

question 3
4 pts
the united states has a ______ court system, which includes both a state and federal court system.

Explanation:

First Question (Multiple Choice)

• Option 1: Executive and legislative branches do not prefer judicial branch to make decisions; they have their own roles, so this is incorrect.
• Option 2: The controversy of issues alone doesn't explain why courts are asked; other branches could address, so incorrect.
• Option 3: Legislative branch writes laws with intent, not due to poor drafting causing litigation, so incorrect.
• Option 4: Courts interpret constitutional limitations (vague language), so controversial policy issues often involve constitutional interpretation, making courts the go - to.

The United States has a dual court system, which consists of both state and federal court systems operating independently but with some overlapping jurisdiction and hierarchical relationships.

Answer:

D. The courts must interpret the vague language of Constitutional limitations on government.

Second Question (Fill - in - the - blank)