Question

in which situation would it be least likely for a scientist to revise her experimental methods?
o if her results support her hypothesis
o if her data do not support her hypothesis
o if no conclusions can be drawn from the data
o if results are the same after repeating the procedure

Explanation:

When results are consistent after repeating the procedure, it indicates the experimental methods are likely reliable. In contrast, results not supporting the hypothesis, inability to draw conclusions, or other issues may prompt method - revision. When results support the hypothesis, there is less need to change methods.

Answer:

If results are the same after repeating the procedure