Question

which are the most likely reasons an interpretation of a historical event could change? choose three correct answers.
oversights and errors are corrected.
new evidence is discovered.
new technology is applied to evidence.
pieces of evidence are lost or stolen.
new opinions are considered.

Explanation:

• "Oversights and errors are corrected": Correcting past mistakes can alter how we interpret events.
• "New evidence is discovered": New info can provide a different perspective on the event.
• "New technology is applied to evidence": Tech can reveal new details from existing evidence, changing interpretations.
• "Pieces of evidence are lost or stolen" would hinder understanding, not change interpretation. "New opinions are considered" is subjective and not a valid reason for historical interpretation change (needs evidence - based changes).

Answer:

• Oversights and errors are corrected.
• New evidence is discovered.
• New technology is applied to evidence.