Question

we conclude that, in the field of public education, the doctrine of \separate but equal\ has no place. separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. therefore, we hold that the plaintiffs and others similarly situated for whom the actions have been brought are, by reason of the segregation complained of, deprived of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the fourteenth amendment. this disposition makes unnecessary any discussion whether such segregation also violates the due - process clause of the fourteenth amendment. what is the main purpose of the passage? to argue complete how does the language used in the passage support the authors purpose? check all of the boxes that are correct for this excerpt. it remains objective and unemotional. it creates powerful imagery. it evokes an emotional response. it reflects reason and logic. done

Explanation:

The passage presents a clear - cut argument against the "separate but equal" doctrine in public education, stating that separate educational facilities are inherently unequal and that segregation deprives plaintiffs of equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment. The language used is logical and objective, using legal reasoning to support the argument. It does not create powerful imagery or evoke an emotional response.

Answer:

It remains objective and unemotional.
It reflects reason and logic.