Sovi.AI - AI Math Tutor

Scan to solve math questions

QUESTION IMAGE

use the passage to answer the question. how does the author support thi…

Question

use the passage to answer the question. how does the author support this central idea of the passage: the crown act is necessary to provide legal protection from discrimination against hairstyles and textures tied to racial identity? (1 point) by explaining why the courts have not always protected hairstyles. by detailing how few laws protect workplace discrimination of any kind. by mentioning that the vice president of the united states supports the law. by listing the different states that have passed a version of the crown act. \ban hair discrimination gaining momentum\ by candice norwood what is the crown act? final legislation can vary slightly from state to state, but most crown act bills forbid discrimination against certain hairstyles and textures within workplaces and schools. the bill builds off existing state laws, which generally prohibit workplace or school discrimination based on religion, gender, sexual orientation and race. but the crown act expands the definition of
ace\ to include \traits historically associated with race, including, but not limited to, hair texture and protective hairstyles,\ like braids, locs and twists. these and other styles known as
atural\ looks do not involve processing to straighten the hair. some bills also seek to end discrimination against adornments related to certain religious and indigenous communities. \our civil rights statutes have been narrowly interpreted by federal courts, among other enforcement bodies, in such a way that it limits racial discrimination to what is known as immutable or unchangeable

Explanation:

Brief Explanations

The passage mentions that civil - rights statutes have been narrowly interpreted by federal courts, limiting protection for hairstyles related to racial identity. By explaining this, the author shows the need for the CROWN Act to provide legal protection.

Answer:

By explaining why the courts have not always protected hairstyles.