Question

teks: 6.10d, 6.11a; dok: 3

1. which revision makes the answer clearer and more specific?

“this is cool.”

“the author uses facts.”

“the author includes statistics about how many animals are affected, which helps readers understand the scope of the problem.”

“the author wants readers to think.”

Explanation:

The first option “This is cool.” is too vague. The second option “The author uses facts.” is also rather general. The fourth option “The author wants readers to think.” is very broad. However, the third option “The author includes statistics about how many animals are affected, which helps readers understand the scope of the problem.” provides specific details (statistics about animal - affected numbers) and explains the purpose (helping readers understand the problem's scope), making it the clearest and most specific.

Answer:

“The author includes statistics about how many animals are affected, which helps readers understand the scope of the problem.”