QUESTION IMAGE
Question
select the correct answer from each drop - down menu.
given: kite abdc with diagonals (overline{ad}) and (overline{bc}) intersecting at e
prove: (overline{ad}) bisects (overline{bc})
determine the missing reasons in the proof
| statement | reason |
|---|---|
| (overline{cd} cong overline{bd}) and (overline{ac} cong overline{ab}) | definition of a kite |
| (overline{ad} cong overline{ad}) | reflexive property of congruence |
|(\triangle cda cong \triangle bda)|
| (angle cda cong angle bda) | cpctc |
| (overline{ed} cong overline{ed}) | reflexive property of congruence |
|(\triangle ced cong \triangle bed)|
| (overline{ce} cong overline{be}) | cpctc |
| (overline{ad}) bisects (overline{bc}) | definition of a bisector |
Step1: Analyze $\triangle CDA \cong \triangle BDA$
We have $\overline{CD} \cong \overline{BD}$, $\overline{AC} \cong \overline{AB}$, and $\overline{AD} \cong \overline{AD}$ (reflexive). By SSS (Side - Side - Side) congruence criterion, if three sides of one triangle are congruent to three sides of another triangle, the triangles are congruent. So $\triangle CDA \cong \triangle BDA$ by SSS.
Step2: Analyze $\triangle CED \cong \triangle BED$
We know $\overline{CD} \cong \overline{BD}$ (from kite definition), $\angle CDA \cong \angle BDA$ (from CPCTC), and $\overline{ED} \cong \overline{ED}$ (reflexive). By SAS (Side - Angle - Side) congruence criterion, if two sides and the included angle of one triangle are congruent to two sides and the included angle of another triangle, the triangles are congruent. So $\triangle CED \cong \triangle BED$ by SAS.
Snap & solve any problem in the app
Get step-by-step solutions on Sovi AI
Photo-based solutions with guided steps
Explore more problems and detailed explanations
For $\triangle CDA \cong \triangle BDA$: SSS (Side - Side - Side) Congruence Criterion
For $\triangle CED \cong \triangle BED$: SAS (Side - Angle - Side) Congruence Criterion