Question

— right away — that it’s ungenerous to say that their religion of love is only silly: we can’t dismiss it in the same way we can mock michael scott, this is not a man with an office birthday catalog, or two revelers grinding in a club.
what two strangers can share a sonnet in speech means that they already share a deep connection — that they are incredibly responsive to each other.
what are we so afraid of?
why would we want to dismiss romeo and juliet or those who claim to be like them?
we talk excitedly about meeting someone and how we “click” or “really hit it off” — how we feel intimately acquainted even though we’ve only just met. this is our way of believing in low-grade love at first sight, while still scorning its full - blown form.

question 4
write: what does the word “scorning” reveal about how most people view love at first sight?

Explanation:

The word "scorning" means to show contempt or disapproval. In the context of love at first sight, it reveals that most people view love at first sight (in its full - blown, intense form like the love of Romeo and Juliet or those who claim to "click" immediately) as something unworthy of respect, perhaps as overly dramatic, unrealistic, or not a serious/valid form of love. They may think that such immediate, intense love lacks the depth or foundation that comes with time - spent getting to know someone, and thus they look down on it.

Answer:

The word "scorning" reveals that most people view full - blown love at first sight (like the love of Romeo and Juliet or immediate deep connections) as unworthy of respect, considering it unrealistic, overly dramatic, or lacking a valid foundation, and they show disapproval or contempt for it.