Question

question 24 (2.5 points)
crunch potato chip company and party pretzels, inc. decide to combine. marlene, a crunchy shareholder, is
dissatisfied with the price that she will receive for her stock. in the absence of fraud or other illegal conduct, marlene’s
exclusive remedy is to

a) refuse to agree to the deal, which cannot then proceed.

b) acquire stock from the other shareholders and thereby obtain corporate control.

c) file a suit to delay the process.

d) exercise an appraisal right.

question 25 (2.5 points)
fresh flowers inc., and other corporations, presents their corporate business concerns at a shareholders’ meeting in the
form of

Explanation:

Question 24

In corporate law, when shareholders are dissatisfied with the stock price in a merger (absent fraud/illegal conduct), the appraisal right allows them to get a judicial valuation of their shares. Option a is wrong as a single shareholder’s refusal won’t stop the deal. Option b is unrelated to the situation. Option c has no basis as there’s no valid reason to delay without fraud. So the correct remedy is exercising appraisal right.

Answer:

d) exercise an appraisal right.

Question 25 (Incomplete, but assuming typical corporate law context)

Since the question is cut off, but typically, corporate business concerns at shareholder meetings are presented as resolutions (e.g., proposals, motions). If options were about forms like resolutions, proxies, etc., but as the question is incomplete, more details are needed. However, if we assume common corporate practice, business concerns are presented as resolutions (or similar formal proposals) at shareholder meetings.