QUESTION IMAGE
Question
question 13 of 15 (1 point) | question attempt: 1 of unlimited
m∠deg < m∠fge
cannot be determined
pr select xy
cannot be determined
Step1: Analyze Triangle QPR
In triangle \( QPR \), two sides are marked equal (isosceles triangle). The given angle is \( 81^\circ \) at \( Q \). So the base angles at \( P \) and \( R \) can be found. The sum of angles in a triangle is \( 180^\circ \), so the other two angles sum to \( 180 - 81 = 99^\circ \). Since it's isosceles, each base angle is \( \frac{99}{2} = 49.5^\circ \).
Step2: Analyze Triangle XZY
In triangle \( XZY \), two sides are marked equal (isosceles triangle). The given angle is \( 96^\circ \) at \( Z \). The other two angles sum to \( 180 - 96 = 84^\circ \), so each base angle is \( \frac{84}{2} = 42^\circ \).
Step3: Compare Sides PR and XY
In a triangle, the larger angle is opposite the longer side. In triangle \( QPR \), the angle opposite \( PR \) is \( 81^\circ \). In triangle \( XZY \), the angle opposite \( XY \) is \( 96^\circ \)? Wait, no. Wait, in triangle \( QPR \), sides \( QP = QR \) (marked), so angles at \( P \) and \( R \) are equal (49.5° each). In triangle \( XZY \), sides \( XZ = YZ \) (marked), so angles at \( X \) and \( Y \) are equal (42° each). Wait, maybe I mixed up. Wait, in triangle \( QPR \), the angle at \( Q \) is \( 81^\circ \), so sides \( QP = QR \), so \( PR \) is opposite \( 81^\circ \). In triangle \( XZY \), angle at \( Z \) is \( 96^\circ \), sides \( XZ = YZ \), so \( XY \) is opposite \( 96^\circ \). Wait, no, in an isosceles triangle, the equal sides are the legs, and the unequal side is the base, opposite the vertex angle. So in \( \triangle QPR \), \( QP = QR \) (legs), so base is \( PR \), opposite \( \angle Q = 81^\circ \). In \( \triangle XZY \), \( XZ = YZ \) (legs), so base is \( XY \), opposite \( \angle Z = 96^\circ \). Wait, but the other sides: Wait, maybe the marked sides are different. Wait, the problem is about comparing \( PR \) and \( XY \). Wait, maybe the triangles have two sides equal (the marked ones) and we can use the Hinge Theorem? Wait, no, the Hinge Theorem (SAS Inequality) states that if two sides of one triangle are congruent to two sides of another triangle, but the included angle is larger, then the third side is longer. But here, the triangles have two sides marked as equal (maybe \( QP = XZ \) and \( QR = YZ \)? Wait, the diagram shows in \( \triangle QPR \), two sides are marked (maybe \( QP \) and \( QR \)), and in \( \triangle XZY \), two sides are marked (maybe \( XZ \) and \( YZ \)). Wait, maybe the marked sides are equal (i.e., \( QP = XZ \) and \( QR = YZ \)). Then, in \( \triangle QPR \), the included angle is \( 81^\circ \), and in \( \triangle XZY \), the included angle is \( 96^\circ \). By the Hinge Theorem, if two sides of one triangle are congruent to two sides of another triangle, and the included angle is larger, then the third side is longer. So since \( 81^\circ < 96^\circ \), the side opposite the larger angle (in the triangle with the larger included angle) would be longer. Wait, no: Hinge Theorem: If \( AB = DE \), \( AC = DF \), and \( \angle A > \angle D \), then \( BC > EF \). So here, if \( QP = XZ \), \( QR = YZ \), and \( \angle Q = 81^\circ \), \( \angle Z = 96^\circ \), then since \( \angle Z > \angle Q \), the side opposite \( \angle Z \) (which is \( XY \)) would be longer than the side opposite \( \angle Q \) (which is \( PR \)). Wait, no, wait: in \( \triangle QPR \), sides \( QP \) and \( QR \) are equal, and included angle \( \angle Q = 81^\circ \), so side \( PR \) is opposite \( \angle Q \). In \( \triangle XZY \), sides \( XZ \) and \( YZ \) are equal, included angle \( \angle Z = 96^\circ \),…
Snap & solve any problem in the app
Get step-by-step solutions on Sovi AI
Photo-based solutions with guided steps
Explore more problems and detailed explanations
\( PR < XY \) (so the correct symbol is \( < \))