QUESTION IMAGE
Question
look at this rectangle:
if both dimensions are doubled, then which of the following statements about its area will be true?
the new area will be 2 times the old area.
the new area will be 16 times the old area.
Step1: Calculate the old area
The formula for the area of a rectangle is \(A = l\times w\). Given \(l = 7\) in and \(w = 3\) in, the old area \(A_{old}=7\times3 = 21\) in².
Step2: Calculate the new dimensions
If both dimensions are doubled, the new length \(l_{new}=2\times7 = 14\) in and the new width \(w_{new}=2\times3 = 6\) in.
Step3: Calculate the new area
Using the area formula \(A = l\times w\), the new area \(A_{new}=14\times6=84\) in².
Step4: Find the ratio of new - to - old area
\(\frac{A_{new}}{A_{old}}=\frac{84}{21}=4\). Another way: If the original length is \(l\) and width is \(w\), \(A_{old}=l\times w\). After doubling, \(l' = 2l\) and \(w'=2w\), then \(A_{new}=(2l)\times(2w)=4(l\times w)=4A_{old}\). But wait, let's check the general formula. If the scale factor of side lengths is \(k\) (here \(k = 2\)), the area scale factor is \(k^{2}\).
Snap & solve any problem in the app
Get step-by-step solutions on Sovi AI
Photo-based solutions with guided steps
Explore more problems and detailed explanations
Neither of the given options is correct. The new area is \(4\) times the old area. But if we assume there was a mis - statement in the problem (maybe if it was a square with side \(4\) and then side \(8\), but for the given rectangle with length \(7\) and width \(3\)):
Let's re - check using the formula \(A = lw\).
Original \(A_{1}=7\times3 = 21\).
New \(A_{2}=(2\times7)\times(2\times3)=4\times(7\times3)=4A_{1}\).
If we consider the general formula for area of a rectangle \(A = lw\), when \(l\) becomes \(2l\) and \(w\) becomes \(2w\), \(A'=(2l)(2w) = 4lw\). So the correct relationship is that the new area is \(4\) times the old area. But since the options are wrong, if we assume a miscalculation in the problem setup (maybe a square with side \(4\) (area \(16\)) and then side \(8\) (area \(64\), \(64 = 4\times16\)) but no, for the given rectangle:
If we follow the strict calculation:
Old area \(A_{old}=7\times3=21\).
New area \(A_{new}=(2\times7)\times(2\times3)=84\).
\(\frac{A_{new}}{A_{old}}=\frac{84}{21} = 4\).