Question

how did the worcester v. georgia, supreme court ruling, impact efforts to remove native tribes from american states? (ssush7a)
the court ruled against the tribes, but granted them protected legal status.
the court ruled against the tribes and forced them to give up most territory.
the court ruled in favor of the tribes, but could not stop forced removal.
the court ruled in favor of the tribes and halted all removal programs.
49 multiple choice 2 points
the sedition act made it illegal to “print, utter, or publish ... any false, scandalous, and malicious writing” about the american government.
how did this law affect the election of 1800? (ssush6b)
criticism of the law contributed to the defeat of the federalist party.
support for the law led to a landslide victory for john adams.

Explanation:

1. In Worcester v. Georgia, the Supreme - Court ruled that the Cherokee Nation was a sovereign nation and that Georgia's laws did not apply to them. However, President Andrew Jackson refused to enforce the ruling, and forced removal of Native tribes continued.
2. The Sedition Act was highly controversial as it restricted free - speech and freedom of the press. Criticism of the act by the Democratic - Republicans contributed to the defeat of the Federalist Party in the 1800 election.

Answer:

1. C. The Court ruled in favor of the tribes, but could not stop forced removal.
2. A. Criticism of the law contributed to the defeat of the Federalist party.