QUESTION IMAGE
Question
the excerpt is from the supreme courts unanimous opinion in 1919. \when a nation is at war, many things that might be said in time of peace are such a hindrance to its effort that their utterance will not be endured so long as men fight, and that no supreme court could regard them as protected by any constitutional right.\ based on the quotation, what led to this supreme court decision? publication of the identification of conscientious objectors led to their conscription in the military. the selective service act led to restricting the freedom of german - americans in internment camps. the committee of public information encouraged women to exercise their constitutional right to vote. national security concerns led to limitations on civil liberties through the espionage and sedition acts
La opinión de la Corte Suprema menciona que durante la guerra, ciertas expresiones que serían permitidas en tiempo de paz pueden ser consideradas un obstáculo para los esfuerzos de la nación y no estar protegidas por derechos constitucionales. Esto se relaciona con las limitaciones a las libertades civiles durante la guerra, como las impuestas por las Leyes de Espionaje y Sedición. Estas leyes restringían la libertad de expresión en nombre de la seguridad nacional.
Snap & solve any problem in the app
Get step-by-step solutions on Sovi AI
Photo-based solutions with guided steps
Explore more problems and detailed explanations
National security concerns led to limitations on civil liberties through the Espionage and Sedition Acts.