Question

claim, evidence, reasoning
directions:

1. actively read both texts.
2. answer the multiple-choice questions.
3. use the graphic organizer to actively read the prompt so you are clear about what the question is asking you to do.
4. make a claim.
5. find evidence/details form both texts that support your claim and answers the prompt.
6. explain how each piece of evidence you have gathered supports the claim.
7. sum up your response.

expectations for a student response

1. the response makes a claim that addresses the prompt.
2. provides evidence and/or details from both texts to support the claim and answers the prompt.
3. explain how the evidence supports the claim.

prompt:
compare hendrik verwoerd’s stated beliefs about “separate development” in source 1 with the actual conditions and outcomes of the bantustan system in source 2.
make a claim that discusses whether you think bantustan was a success?
use evidence, facts, and details from both sources to support your argument.
rewrite the prompt in your own words
claim:

evidence:

Explanation:

To rewrite the prompt, we need to rephrase it while preserving the core task: comparing Verwoerd’s beliefs on “separate development” (from Source 1) with the Bantustan system’s actual conditions/outcomes (from Source 2), then making a claim about Bantustan’s success using evidence from both sources.

Answer:

Rewrite the Prompt in your own words: Compare Hendrik Verwoerd’s ideas about “separate development” (from Source 1) with how the Bantustan system actually worked and what results it had (from Source 2). Then, state whether you think the Bantustan system was successful, and use evidence, facts, and details from both sources to support your argument.