Question

1 according to the miranda v. arizona ruling, when must police stop questioning a suspect? choose more than one answer.
□ if the suspect chooses to remain silent
□ if the suspect asks to talk to an attorney
□ if the suspect confesses to a crime.
□ if the suspect does not understand their miranda rights
□ if the suspect asks for the supreme court to review their case
□ if police have enough evidence to charge the suspect with a crime

Explanation:

The Miranda v. Arizona ruling established that police must stop questioning a suspect if the suspect invokes their right to remain silent or their right to an attorney.

• "If the suspect chooses to remain silent": When a suspect invokes the right to remain silent, police must stop questioning.
• "If the suspect asks to talk to an attorney": When a suspect requests an attorney, police must stop questioning until the attorney is present.
• "If the suspect confesses to a crime": Confession does not require police to stop questioning.
• "If the suspect does not understand their Miranda rights": Lack of understanding does not trigger the requirement to stop questioning.
• "If the suspect asks for the Supreme Court to review their case": This is not related to Miranda rights and does not require police to stop questioning.
• "If police have enough evidence to charge the suspect with a crime": Evidence availability does not require police to stop questioning.

Answer:

A. If the suspect chooses to remain silent
B. If the suspect asks to talk to an attorney