Question

which of the following statements support the claim in freakonomics that \people are generally good even without enforcement\?
small offices are more honest than big ones.
unseasonably cold weather makes people cheat.
company morale is a major factor in honesty.
many people enjoy using the honor system.

Explanation:

The claim "people are generally good even without enforcement" implies that people have an inherent sense of goodness. The statement "Many people enjoy using the honor system" shows that people are willing to be honest and good without external enforcement (as the honor system relies on people's own integrity). Small offices being more honest than big ones might be due to other factors like social pressure in a smaller group (not directly about inherent goodness without enforcement). Unseasonably cold weather making people cheat is about an external factor causing negative behavior (opposite of the claim). Company morale being a factor in honesty is about an internal - company factor (not about inherent goodness without any enforcement - like the honor system which is more about personal integrity).

Answer:

Many people enjoy using the honor system.