Question

which of the following best summarizes how the conflicts in rwanda in 1994 are related to the holocaust?
the events in rwanda show that genocide can still happen, despite the impact of the holocaust.
the events in rwanda show that genocide has stopped because of the effects of the holocaust.
the events in rwanda show that the international community has forgotten the impact of the holocaust.
the events in rwanda show that the international community no longer cares about the effects of the holocaust.

Explanation:

The Rwandan genocide in 1994 was a large - scale ethnic - based mass killing. The Holocaust was also a genocide (of Jews, Roma, etc. by Nazi Germany). Just because the Holocaust happened and was a significant event in history (with efforts to prevent such atrocities through education, memorials, etc.) does not mean genocide has been eradicated. The Rwandan conflict shows that despite the awareness and efforts post - Holocaust (such as the establishment of the United Nations Genocide Convention), genocide can still occur.
The second option is incorrect because the Rwandan genocide shows that genocide did not stop. The third and fourth options are too extreme. While the international community's response to Rwanda was criticized (for being slow or insufficient), it does not mean they "forgot" or "no longer care" about the Holocaust's impact.

Answer:

The events in Rwanda show that genocide can still happen, despite the impact of the Holocaust.