Question

what is one argument in favor of federal judges having lifetime appointments?
○ judges can push their own political agendas.
○ judges can retire when their political party is in power.
○ judges can be chosen for age instead of experience.
○ judges can rule on cases without fearing retribution.

Explanation:

To determine the correct argument in favor of federal judges' lifetime appointments, we analyze each option:

• "Judges can push their own political agendas" is a negative aspect, not a favorable argument for lifetime appointments.
• "Judges can retire when their political party is in power" implies political motivation, which is not a positive reason for lifetime appointments.
• "Judges can be chosen for age instead of experience" is not a valid or favorable argument for lifetime appointments.
• "Judges can rule on cases without fearing retribution" is a key benefit of lifetime appointments, as it allows judges to make impartial decisions without worrying about losing their position due to unpopular rulings.

Answer:

D. Judges can rule on cases without fearing retribution.