Question

what is the main difference between hobbes and lockes views on human nature? hobbes believed humans are naturally cooperative, while locke believed they are naturally competitive. hobbes believed humans are inherently good, while locke believed they are inherently bad. hobbes believed humans are inherently evil and selfish, while locke believed they are capable of reason and cooperation. hobbes believed humans are naturally rational, while locke believed they are naturally emotional.

Explanation:

Thomas Hobbes, in his work "Leviathan," posited that in the state - of - nature, humans are driven by self - preservation and are inherently evil and selfish, resulting in a "war of all against all." John Locke, on the other hand, believed humans are born as a tabula rasa (blank slate) and are capable of reason and cooperation, which forms the basis for social contracts.

Answer:

Hobbes believed humans are inherently evil and selfish, while Locke believed they are capable of reason and cooperation.