Question

what is a common misconception about minimum viable product (mvp)?

mvp is irrelevant in the business world

mvp is often seen as a product with a basic set of features and low quality

mvp is only suitable for established brands, not startups

mvp is a high - quality product

Explanation:

A common misconception about MVP is that it's a product with low quality. The correct understanding is that MVP has a basic set of features to validate a business idea, not that it's low - quality. The option “MVP is often seen as a product with a basic set of features and low quality” represents this misconception. The other options: “MVP is irrelevant in the business world” is incorrect as MVP is relevant for validating ideas; “MVP is only suitable for established brands, not startups” is wrong as startups often use MVP; “MVP is a high - quality product” is also a misconception but the more common and core misconception about MVP's quality and feature set is the one about it being basic - featured and low - quality.

Answer:

MVP is often seen as a product with a basic set of features and low quality