werent as bad as she thought.
one becomes agitated and begins to cry.
18. ______ why did mathilde choose the diamond necklace?
a. it was the most noticeable.
b. it was the only jewelry her friend would lend her.
c. she knew her husband would like it.
d. she thought it would look best with her dress.
19. ______ how was mathilde first reminded of the contrast between her real life and her place at the ball?
a. her husband was asleep in an adjoining room.
b. her friend deserted her.
c. her husband helped her to put her ordinary wrap on.
d. her friend offered to call a cab.
20. ______ over what time period does this story take place?
a. ten months
b. two months
c. ten years
d. ten months
21. how does mr. loisel suggest they avoid telling mrs. forrester the necklace was lost? must use a complete sentence to answer this question. use the cer format to respond.
22. describe the contrast between mrs. loisel’s life before and after she lost the necklace. must use a complete sentence to answer this question. use the cer format to respond.
23. what is the setting of this story? must use a complete sentence to answer this question. use the cer format to respond.
24. why do you think mr. and madame loisel felt compelled to replace the necklace? what does this say about them? must use a complete sentence/sentences to answer this question. use the cer format to respond.

Question

werent as bad as she thought.
one becomes agitated and begins to cry.
18. ______ why did mathilde choose the diamond necklace?
    a. it was the most noticeable.
    b. it was the only jewelry her friend would lend her.
    c. she knew her husband would like it.
    d. she thought it would look best with her dress.
19. ______ how was mathilde first reminded of the contrast between her real life and her place at the ball?
    a. her husband was asleep in an adjoining room.
    b. her friend deserted her.
    c. her husband helped her to put her ordinary wrap on.
    d. her friend offered to call a cab.
20. ______ over what time period does this story take place?
    a. ten months
    b. two months
    c. ten years
    d. ten months
21. how does mr. loisel suggest they avoid telling mrs. forrester the necklace was lost? must use a complete sentence to answer this question. use the cer format to respond.
22. describe the contrast between mrs. loisel’s life before and after she lost the necklace. must use a complete sentence to answer this question. use the cer format to respond.
23. what is the setting of this story? must use a complete sentence to answer this question. use the cer format to respond.
24. why do you think mr. and madame loisel felt compelled to replace the necklace? what does this say about them? must use a complete sentence/sentences to answer this question. use the cer format to respond.

Accepted Answer

To answer these questions, we analyze each one based on the story "The Necklace" by Guy de Maupassant:

### Question 18
# Brief Explanations:
In "The Necklace," Mathilde chooses the diamond necklace because it is the most noticeable (option a). She is concerned with appearance and wants to stand out at the ball, and the diamond necklace is the most eye - catching piece of jewelry her friend has.
# Answer:
a. It was the most noticeable.

### Question 19
# Brief Explanations:
Mathilde is first reminded of the contrast between her real life and her place at the ball when her husband helps her put on her ordinary wrap (option c). The ordinary wrap is a symbol of her lower - class, ordinary life, and when her husband helps her put it on after the ball (where she felt like a lady of high society), the contrast between the two worlds becomes clear.
# Answer:
c. Her husband helped her to put her ordinary wrap on.

### Question 20
# Brief Explanations:
The story of "The Necklace" takes place over a period of ten years (option c). After losing the necklace, Mathilde and her husband spend ten years working hard to pay off the debt from replacing the necklace.
# Answer:
c. ten years

### Question 21
# Brief Explanations:
**Claim**: Mr. Loisel suggests they avoid telling Mrs. Forrester the necklace was lost by proposing that they take time to find it first and then, if they can't, they will tell her.
**Evidence**: In the story, when the necklace is lost, Mr. Loisel says they should retrace their steps, look for it everywhere, and give themselves some time (a few days) to find it before informing Mrs. Forrester.
**Reasoning**: He thinks that if they tell her immediately, it will cause a great deal of trouble and embarrassment. By trying to find it first, they might be able to avoid that situation. So, Mr. Loisel suggests they search for the necklace for a while and delay telling Mrs. Forrester about the loss.
# Answer:
Mr. Loisel suggests they avoid telling Mrs. Forrester the necklace was lost by proposing they search for the necklace for a few days first and only tell her if they cannot find it. (CER: Claim - Mr. Loisel has a plan to delay telling Mrs. Forrester. Evidence - He wants to retrace steps and look for it. Reasoning - To avoid immediate trouble and embarrassment.)

### Question 22
# Brief Explanations:
**Claim**: Mrs. Loisel's life before losing the necklace was one of dissatisfaction with her ordinary, middle - class life, while after losing the necklace, it was one of hard - working poverty.
**Evidence**: Before, she was unhappy with her small apartment, old furniture, and lack of luxury, constantly dreaming of a more elegant life. After losing the necklace, she and her husband had to move to a cheaper apartment, she did all the household chores herself, and they worked long hours at menial jobs to pay off the debt.
**Reasoning**: The loss of the necklace forced her into a life of hard labor and poverty, which was a stark contrast to her previous life of relative comfort (even though she was dissatisfied) and her dreams of luxury. So, before losing the necklace, Mrs. Loisel lived a dissatisfied middle - class life, and after, she lived a life of hard - working poverty.
# Answer:
Before losing the necklace, Mrs. Loisel lived a dissatisfied middle - class life, and after losing the necklace, she lived a life of hard - working poverty. (CER: Claim - There is a contrast in Mrs. Loisel's life. Evidence - Her pre - loss dissatisfaction and post - loss hard work/poverty. Reasoning - The necklace loss caused a major life change.)

### Question 23
# Brief Explanations:
**Claim**: The setting of the story "The Necklace" is in 19th - century France, in both a middle - class Parisian apartment and at a high - society ball, as well as in the poorer areas of Paris where the Loisels live after losing the necklace.
**Evidence**: The story describes the Loisel's middle - class apartment with its old furniture, the opulent ball at the Ministry, and the shabby apartment they move to later. Also, the social norms and class structure of 19th - century France are evident, with the contrast between the middle class and the upper class.
**Reasoning**: The different settings (middle - class home, ballroom, poor neighborhood) help to highlight the themes of class, appearance, and the consequences of Mathilde's actions. So, the setting is 19th - century France, including a middle - class Parisian home, a high - society ball, and a poor Parisian neighborhood.
# Answer:
The setting of the story "The Necklace" is 19th - century France, including a middle - class Parisian apartment, a high - society ball, and a poor Parisian neighborhood. (CER: Claim - The story is set in 19th - century France in multiple locations. Evidence - Descriptions of the Loisel's home, the ball, and their later home. Reasoning - To show class differences and the impact of the necklace loss.)

### Question 24
# Brief Explanations:
**Claim**: Mr. and Madame Loisel felt compelled to replace the necklace because they were concerned about their reputation and did not want to be seen as thieves or people who could not be trusted.
**Evidence**: In the story, they knew that the necklace was very valuable, and if they did not replace it, Mrs. Forrester would think they had stolen it or were irresponsible. They also wanted to maintain the appearance of being able to afford such a necklace (at least in the short - term when they borrowed it).
**Reasoning**: Their sense of honor and the fear of social disgrace forced them to take on the huge debt of replacing the necklace. This shows that they were very concerned with how they were perceived by others in society. So, Mr. and Madame Loisel felt compelled to replace the necklace to protect their reputation, and this shows they were highly concerned with social standing and honor.
# Answer:
Mr. and Madame Loisel felt compelled to replace the necklace to protect their reputation (they didn't want to be seen as thieves or irresponsible), and this shows they were very concerned with social standing and honor. (CER: Claim - They felt compelled to replace it. Evidence - Fear of being seen badly. Reasoning - To maintain social reputation.)

Sovi.AI - AI Math Tutor

QUESTION IMAGE

Question

Explanation:

Question 18

Answer:

Question 19