Question

using a lens of historical empathy, which of the following tables depicts a historical perspective that differs from today and describes the process alexander the great used to build the macedonian empire? (1 point)
historical perspectives of asia minor, egypt, and persia
asia minor | egypt | persia
description | won the battle of issus sacked city of tyre, massacring and enslaving inhabitants liberated cities from persian rule | siege of gaza promoted hellenization among local egyptians, macedonians, and greeks adopted egyptian religion, proclaimed son of zeus - ammon | won the battle of gaugamela and the battle of the granicus proclaimed himself king of europe after defeating darius iii captured persepolis, babylon, and susa adopted persian traditions
historical perspective | inhumane and unjust massacre of the inhabitants of tyre methods of warfare different than todays sieges and sacking of cities were common ancient practices | embraced local culture, religion, and ideas allowed conquered peoples to retain their identity, less common during the time period | conquest of cities common during the time period disregarded local cultural and religious ideas cultural and religious intolerance was uncommon during the time period
historical perspectives of asia minor, egypt, and persia
asia minor | egypt | persia
description | won the battle of the granicus and the battle of issus sacked city of tyre, massacring and enslaving | siege of gaza did not force ideals, values, or religion proclaimed himself king of egypt after defeating | won the battle of gaugamela and the battle of the persian gate captured persepolis, babylon, and susa

Explanation:

Alexander the Great's military conquests included winning key battles like the Battle of Issus, the Battle of the Granicus, and the Battle of Gaugamela. He sacked cities such as Tyre. In Egypt, he promoted Hellenization while also adopting local religion and proclaiming himself as the son of Zeus - Ammon. In Persia, he adopted Persian traditions after conquests. Analyzing the tables, the first table correctly describes his actions and the historical perspectives that differ from modern - day views. Sieges, sackings, and conquests were common in ancient warfare, and his approach to local cultures varied by region.

Answer:

The first table (the one with the detailed descriptions under "Asia Minor", "Egypt", and "Persia" and the corresponding historical perspectives)