Question

the traveler scanned the distant dunes for a glimpse of green, indicating an oasis where he could camp. his path stretched lazily behind him, a wandering line of footprints that told the tale of the traveler. the thin track, lacking both origin and destination, strayed far from the well - worn trail taken by others. at last, he saw an emerald gleam on the horizon, offering the promise of shade, water, and perhaps food. the traveler hoped it was not a mirage. which describes the meaning of the authors comparison between the traveler and his tracks in the sand? 1 the traveler is mysterious and prefers to walk alone. 2 the traveler is destined to live his life in the desert. 3 the traveler is only seeing a mirage, not an oasis.

Explanation:

The text mentions the traveler's path "stretched lazily behind him, a wandering line of footprints that told the tale of the traveler. The thin track, lacking both origin and destination, strayed far from the well - worn trail taken by others". This description implies that the traveler is not following a common path (so he is alone) and the lack of origin/destination gives a sense of mystery. Option 2 is incorrect as there is no indication of a desert - destined life. Option 3 is wrong because the text says "the traveler hoped it was not a mirage", not that it definitely was.

Answer:

1. The traveler is mysterious and prefers to walk alone.