Question

the supreme court heard oral arguments on friday regarding the federal law that orders tiktok to sever ties with its chinese parent company bytedance, or face a ban. the law, enacted in april, has been met with legal challenges from tiktok and its creators, who argue it violates their first amendment rights by silencing their speech. however, the justices, including those from both sides of the political spectrum, expressed skepticism towards tiktok’s arguments, questioning how the law implicates their first amendment rights when it specifically targets bytedance, a foreign - owned entity, and its algorithm.
justice ketanji brown jackson suggested that tiktok’s case was more about their desire to remain associated with bytedance rather than their speech being silenced. chief justice john roberts argued that the law does not burden tiktok users’ expression, stating that congress is not opposed to the content itself but rather the potential for a foreign adversary to gather information about users through bytedance’s ownership. the justices also questioned the government’s arguments, with justice neil gorsuch suggesting a warning label about potential chinese manipulation might suffice. however, he also raised concerns about the sealed evidence justifying the ban, which even tiktok’s lawyers were unable to view.
the supreme court’s decision on the ban’s fate could come within days, before the ban is scheduled to take effect on january 19th. the court’s swift scheduling of oral arguments suggests they are prepared to rule imminently. while the justices expressed skepticism towards tiktok’s arguments, they also raised concerns about the government’s approach, suggesting a potential for a more nuanced solution than a complete ban. the outcome of this case will have significant implications for the future of tiktok in the united states, potentially shaping the landscape of social media and the relationship between technology and national security.
based on the situation above, which statements best illustrates how previous events/people/ideas led to the us government today?
□ the supreme court deciding if the tiktok ban is legal shows how courts check if laws follow the constitution.
□ congress made the law about tiktok, and the supreme court is deciding if it’s fair. this shows how different parts of the government have separate jobs to keep things balanced.

Explanation:

Both statements relate to the U.S. system of checks and balances, where government branches oversee each other to uphold the Constitution and balance power. The first focuses on judicial review (courts verifying constitutionality), while the second explicitly references separate government roles maintaining balance. Both correctly illustrate how foundational U.S. governmental ideas (checks and balances, judicial review) shape current government actions.

Answer:

• The Supreme Court deciding if the TikTok ban is legal shows how courts check if laws follow the Constitution.
• Congress made the law about TikTok, and the Supreme Court is deciding if it's fair. This shows how different parts of the government have separate jobs to keep things balanced.