Question

the ruling in palko v. connecticut
the supreme courts decision
the supreme court faced a difficult question about how to interpret the rights of citizens. should the “due - process clause” of the fourteenth amendment give certain protections from the bill of rights (including the fifth amendment) at the state level?
the supreme court decided in a 5 - 4 ruling that palkos conviction and execution should be upheld. the court determined that due process did not be incorporated at the state level under the fourteenth amendment. the decision explained that certain “fundamental” rights did not have to be enforced at the state level, including freedom of speech and religion. protection from double jeopardy was not seen as a fundamental right.
what was the supreme courts main decision in palko v. connecticut?
palkos conviction and execution should be upheld
palko could not be convicted because of his fifth amendment rights

Explanation:

In Palko v. Connecticut, the Supreme - Court ruled that Palko's conviction and execution should be upheld. It held that certain "fundamental" rights from the Bill of Rights should be applied at the state level under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, but protection from double - jeopardy was not considered a fundamental right at that time.

Answer:

Palko's conviction and execution should be upheld