Question

read the two excerpts.
remembering is never forget: dominican republics parsley massacre by mark memmott
seventy - five years ago, thousands of haitians were murdered in the dominican republic by a brutal dictator. it was one of the 20th centurys least - remembered acts of genocide.
as many as 20,000 people are thought to have been killed on orders given by rafael trujillo. but the parsley massacre went mostly unnoticed outside hispaniola. even there, many dominicans never knew about what happened in early october 1937. they were kept in the dark by trujillos henchmen.
a genetics of justice by julia alvarez
during my early teen years in the country, i knew very little about what was actually going on in the dominican
which statements best compares how the two authors address this topic?
memmott writes well after the events occurred, while alvarez writes while the events are occurring.
memmott tells about one event that occurred, while alvarez tells about the dictatorship as a whole.
memmott gives an anecdote to tell about the dictatorships cruelty, while alvarez tells about her family.
memmott presents facts about the dictatorship objectively, while alvarez gives details about how it affected people.

Explanation:

Memmott presents objective facts like the number of people killed (up to 20,000) and the dictator's name (Rafael Trujillo). Alvarez, on the other hand, gives personal details about how the dictatorship affected people (her own experience as a child in the country not knowing what was really going on).

Answer:

Memmott presents facts about the dictatorship objectively, while Alvarez gives details about how it affected people.