Question

read the paragraph.

1. in conclusion, of all the possible careers in film, the producer’s job is the one that’s really cool. 2. among its many prerequisites, the job of the producer requires creativity, leadership, and communication skills, along with superior organizational skills. 3. it’ll keep you on your toes, that’s for sure.

which is the best peer evaluation of the conclusion?
○ the details and mechanics are good, but sentences 2 and 3 should be reorganized to include logical transitions.
○ the word choice and style are good, but there are punctuation and organizational errors in sentences 1 and 2.
○ the mechanics and organization are good, but sentences 1 and 3 should be edited to achieve a formal style and objective tone.
○ the tone and style are good, but errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation in sentences 1, 2, and 3 should be fixed.

Explanation:

The conclusion has an informal tone (e.g., "really cool", "It'll keep you on your toes"). The mechanics (grammar, spelling) and organization seem okay, but sentences 1 and 3 need editing for a formal, objective style. The first option talks about reorganizing sentences 2 and 3 (not relevant), the second about punctuation/organizational errors in 1 and 2 (no such errors), the fourth about grammar/spelling/punctuation errors (none present). So the third option is correct.

Answer:

The mechanics and organization are good, but sentences 1 and 3 should be edited to achieve a formal style and objective tone.