Question

question 48 1 pts sue has twin baby boys and is trying to decide whether or not to have them vaccinated against chickenpox or to take them to a \chickenpox party\ where they can be naturally exposed to other children who currently have chickenpox. which of the following would not be a relevant question for sue to research before making her decision? are there lots of parents on the internet endorsing the chickenpox parties? do any relevant studies make testable and falsifiable predictions related to a clearly stated hypothesis? are the relevant studies well designed and described with large sample sizes, minimization of bias, and have the results been reproducible? are there any scientific studies of observable and quantifiable claims regarding the chickenpox vaccine and/or chickenpox parties?

Explanation:

When making a medical - related decision about vaccination or natural exposure, the credibility of scientific studies is crucial. Questions about study design, testability, and quantifiability are relevant. However, the number of parents endorsing chickenpox parties on the Internet does not provide scientific evidence for the decision. It is more of a popularity - based or anecdotal factor rather than a scientific one.

Answer:

A. Are there lots of parents on the Internet endorsing the chickenpox parties?