Question

question 7 of 41
submit test
shoe size
1 - 1\frac{1}{2}
2 - 2\frac{1}{2}
3 - 3\frac{1}{2}
4 - 4\frac{1}{2}
5 - 5\frac{1}{2}
6 - 6\frac{1}{2}
which statement is a valid conclusion?

• the number of questions correct is not correlated with the size of a students shoe.
• having a bigger shoe size causes a student to answer more questions correctly.
• an increase in the number of questions answered correctly causes a students shoe size to increase.
• math ability may be correlated to the size of a students shoe, but the correlation is likely coincidental or related to a third variable.

Explanation:

To determine the valid conclusion, we analyze each option:

• The first option claims no correlation, but we can't assume that without data.
• The second and third options imply causation (shoe size causing correct answers or vice versa), which is incorrect as correlation doesn't imply causation.
• The fourth option states that math ability (a third variable) could be related, and the correlation between shoe size and math ability (implied by shoe size and correct questions) is likely coincidental or due to a third variable. This follows the principle that correlation doesn't imply causation and third variables can create spurious correlations.

Answer:

MATH ABILITY MAY BE CORRELATED TO THE SIZE OF A STUDENT'S SHOE, BUT THE CORRELATION IS LIKELY COINCIDENTAL OR RELATED TO A THIRD VARIABLE.