Question

purpose
write a response that evaluates a group discussion.

background information
for this assignment, you will have a discussion with at least two peers. your discussion will be based on an excerpt from the count of monte cristo by alexandre dumas and will include evidence that demonstrates explicit and implicit meanings found in the text. you will then reflect on your experience and evaluate your participation in planning, speaking, and listening. you will complete the assignment by submitting your response.

assignment instructions
step 1: work collaboratively to set discussion rules and guidelines.
a) meet with other participants before the discussion to develop a plan.
b) confirm that the team knows the topic and text that will be the basis of the discussion.
c) set clear goals with the team that include deadlines for preparation, the discussion schedule, the discussion length, and each discussion members role.
d) with the aid of a teacher or other adult, decide on how the moderators role will function.
e) determine the discussion purpose and the audience.
f) decide on the formality of the discussion and rules for consensus, vote - taking, and presentation of alternate viewpoints.
step 2: prepare your evidence.
a) reread the excerpt from your lesson assignment the count of monte cristo by alexandre dumas, and any additional texts needed for you to thoroughly understand the topic.
b) gather facts, examples, and anecdotes about the topic and cite your sources.
c) determine your viewpoint based on your analysis of the facts you have gathered.
d) take notes to organize your viewpoint with evidence that supports explicit and implicit meanings found in the text.

Explanation:

The assignment is about conducting and evaluating a group - discussion on an excerpt from The Count of Monte Cristo. It involves setting rules, preparing evidence, and reflecting on participation in planning, speaking, and listening.

Answer:

No specific question is asked in the provided text. However, if the task is to write the evaluation of the group - discussion as per the assignment, one should first describe the group's collaborative efforts in setting rules (mentioning each sub - step like meeting before, confirming the topic, setting goals etc.). Then, detail the evidence preparation process. Finally, reflect on one's own and the group's performance in planning, speaking, and listening during the discussion.