QUESTION IMAGE
Question
the proof \\( \triangle abc\cong\triangle dcb \\) that is shown.
what is the missing reason in the proof?
- \\( \angle a\cong\angle d \\)
- given
- \\( cd\parallel ab \\)
- given
- \\( cb\cong bc \\)
- refl. prop.
- \\( \angle abc\cong\angle dcb \\)
- alt. int. \\( \angle s \\) are \\( \cong \\)
- \\( \triangle abc\cong\triangle dcb \\)
- ?
alt. ext. \\( \angle s \\) are \\( \cong \\)
asa
aas
corr. int. \\( \angle s \\) are \\( \cong \\)
Step1: Recall triangle congruence theorems
We have two angles (\(\angle A\cong\angle D\), \(\angle ABC\cong\angle DCB\)) and one side (\(CB = BC\)) in the two triangles \(\triangle ABC\) and \(\triangle DCB\).
Step2: Identify the congruence theorem
The AAS (Angle - Angle - Side) theorem states that if two angles and a non - included side of one triangle are congruent to two angles and the corresponding non - included side of another triangle, then the two triangles are congruent. Here, \(\angle A\cong\angle D\), \(\angle ABC\cong\angle DCB\) and \(CB\cong BC\) (reflexive property) satisfy the AAS condition for \(\triangle ABC\) and \(\triangle DCB\).
Snap & solve any problem in the app
Get step-by-step solutions on Sovi AI
Photo-based solutions with guided steps
Explore more problems and detailed explanations
AAS