Question

for others, their experiences limit their ability to understand the experiences of others. others simply do not care. hence, one must accept the proposition that a difference there will be by the presence of women and people of color on the bench. personal experiences affect the facts that judges choose to see. my hope is that i will take the good from my experiences and extrapolate them further into areas with which i am unfamiliar. i simply do not know exactly what that difference will be in my judging. but i accept there will be some based on my gender and my latina heritage. - \a latina judges voice,\ sonia sotomayor how does the author use pathos to support her purpose? the author appeals to the audiences values by saying, \others simply do not care.\ the author appeals to the audiences emotions by saying, \my latina heritage.\ the author appeals to the audiences values by saying, \personal experiences affect the facts.\ the author appeals to the audiences emotions by saying, \that difference will be in my judging.\

Explanation:

Pathos is an appeal to emotions. The first and third options are appeals to values (logos or ethos - not pathos). The second option is incorrect as "my Latina heritage" is more of an identity statement. The fourth option, "That difference will be in my judging," when considering the context of personal experiences (gender and Latina heritage affecting judgment) can evoke an emotional response from the audience as it touches on the idea of how personal aspects shape a significant role (judging), which is an emotional appeal (pathos).

Answer:

The author appeals to the audience's emotions by saying, "That difference will be in my judging."