Question

by the oppressed.
how does dr. king acknowledge and
address opposing viewpoints
regarding the need for direct action?

he dismisses the need for
negotiation with oppressors.

he argues that oppressed people
must push for change through direct
action.

he acknowledges that the
oppressors may change voluntarily if
given time.

he agrees with the idea that
patience is a virtue in the fight for civil
rights.

Explanation:

To answer this, we analyze each option:

• The first option is incorrect as Dr. King didn't dismiss negotiation entirely but recognized direct action's need.
• The second option aligns with Dr. King's stance: he argued that oppressed people must take direct action (like non - violent protests) to achieve change, as negotiation alone often failed and oppressors were unlikely to voluntarily give up power.
• The third option is wrong because Dr. King believed oppressors wouldn't change voluntarily over time without pressure from direct action.
• The fourth option is incorrect as he thought patience without action would not lead to civil rights progress; direct action was necessary.

Answer:

B. He argues that oppressed people must push for change through direct action.