Question

linguist john mcwhorter asserts that translation apps for smartphones and computers are - despite generally failing to convey many nuances - increasingly obviating the need to learn new languages. advances in language processing technology have greatly boosted the utility of these apps for perfunctory tasks, like inquiring about an item on a menu, and passing interactions; be that as it may, richer communication (e.g., in business dealings or meaningful personal exchanges) often hinges on conversational patterns and gradations of meaning.
what does the text most directly suggest about translation apps?
a. they have improved remarkably over time but remain insufficient to support the complexity called for in certain interactions.
b. they are coming to be embraced by international tourists but are viewed with skepticism by many business professionals.
c. they are becoming simpler to use but are inconsistent in how comprehensively they cover different languages.
d. they have gained impressive capabilities but continue to be widely viewed as inadequate for most practical purposes.

Explanation:

The question is about translation apps. Option A says they have improved over time but are insufficient for certain interactions. This aligns with the idea that while there are advances (improved), there are still limitations (insufficient for complex interactions like those of international tourists who might have more nuanced communication needs compared to basic menu - item or perfunctory task interactions). Option B is about being embraced by international tourists but viewed with skepticism by business professionals - there is no clear indication of such a split in the text. Option C about becoming simpler but inconsistent is not supported. Option D about being inadequate for most practical purposes is too extreme as the text mentions they boost utility for some tasks.

Answer:

A. They have improved remarkably over time but remain insufficient to support the complexity called for in certain interactions.