Question

to label or not to label: california prepares to vote on genetically engineered foods by richard day (excerpt) although campaigns for and against ge labeling for genetically engineered foods in california are focusing heavily on economic impacts, the real debate revolves around a scientific question: are these foods truly safe or not? \i think its fair to say that most scientists think the techniques that are used to create ge plants are not inherently dangerous,\ says peggy lemaux, a cooperative extension specialist in the plant and microbial biology department at the university of california, berkeley. in fact, in 2010 the european commission released an analysis of 50 studies conducted on ge foods over the last 25 years and concluded that ge technologies posed no greater risks than conventional breeding. \the reason i dont worry about gmos genetically modified foods is not because someone has convinced me with a big study that theyre safe,\ says michael eisen, an associate professor of genetics, genomics, and development at the university of california, berkeley, and an investigator at the howard hughes medical institute. \its because when i look at the technology, i understand what this technology is doing. theyre introducing proteins that have been very well - characterized into plants, and i dont see any reason at all to suspect that these are harmful.\ some scientists, however, believe questions about the safety of ge foods are far from answered. doug gurian - sherman, senior scientist with the food and environment program at the union of concerned scientists, says the question is not whether theres risk involved in ge foods, but whether its greater than risks posed by conventional foods. \because of the greater capacity to bring unknown quantities into the food supply, im of the school that says it has somewhat higher potential for risk,\ he says. \other scientists say no. but i dont think its a settled question.\ select the correct answer which description provides the best objective summary of the article in the passage? a. the purpose of the article is to tilt the readers opinion against food labeling for genetically engineered food. it presents expert opinion to support the claim that genetically engineered foods are safe and dismisses the opposing arguments. b. the purpose of the article is to tilt the readers opinion in favor of food labeling for genetically engineered food. it refutes claims that genetically engineered foods are safe by using expert opinion to support the opposite claim. c. the article presents a balanced view of the debate about labeling genetically engineered foods. it examines the claim that genetically engineered foods are as safe as organic foods and then examines claims to the contrary. d. the article presents a balanced view of the debate about labeling genetically engineered foods. its purpose is to demonstrate fallacies in different arguments for and against the claim that genetically engineered foods are safe.

Explanation:

The article presents different expert - opinions on the safety of genetically engineered foods and the debate around labeling them, without clearly tilting towards one side. It examines both the claim that they are safe and the counter - claims.

Answer:

C. The article presents a balanced view of the debate about labeling genetically engineered foods. It examines the claim that genetically engineered foods are as safe as organic foods and then examines claims to the contrary.