Question

how did the later university college london study differ from milgrams?
ela.e1.aor.2.2 evaluate supporting details an author uses to develop a central idea(s) over the course of an informational text.

it rewarded participants for kindness instead of punishment.

it proved milgrams results were completely wrong.

it showed people preferred to shock themselves rather than a stranger for money.

it focused on children rather than adults since they are less likely to be evil at a young age.

Explanation:

Milgram's original experiments focused on obedience to authority via administering (simulated) harmful shocks to others. The later UCL study modified this by having participants choose between shocking themselves or a stranger for financial reward, a key difference from Milgram's setup. The other options are incorrect: the study did not use kindness rewards, did not fully disprove Milgram's results, and did not focus on children.

Answer:

It showed people preferred to shock themselves rather than a stranger for money.