QUESTION IMAGE
Question
given: ∠1 ≅ ∠2
prove: p || q
statements
- ∠1 ≅ ∠2
- ∠1 and ∠3 are vertical ∠s
∠3 ≅ ∠2
reasons
- given
- def. of vertical ∠s
converse of corresponding angles theorem
the statement is part of this proof, but at least one other statement must come before it
clear
Step1: Recall Vertical Angles Theorem
Vertical angles are congruent, so from step 2 ($\angle1$ and $\angle3$ are vertical $\angle$s), we get $\angle1\cong\angle3$.
Step2: Use Transitive Property
We know $\angle1\cong\angle2$ (given) and $\angle1\cong\angle3$ (vertical angles theorem). By transitive property of congruence, $\angle3\cong\angle2$.
Step3: Apply Converse of Corresponding Angles Theorem
Since $\angle3$ and $\angle2$ are corresponding angles and $\angle3\cong\angle2$, by converse of corresponding angles theorem, $p\parallel q$. But for the missing statement, after step 2, we use transitive property on $\angle1\cong\angle2$ and $\angle1\cong\angle3$ to get $\angle3\cong\angle2$.
Snap & solve any problem in the app
Get step-by-step solutions on Sovi AI
Photo-based solutions with guided steps
Explore more problems and detailed explanations
The missing statement is $\boldsymbol{\angle3\cong\angle2}$ (obtained by transitive property from $\angle1\cong\angle2$ and $\angle1\cong\angle3$).