Question

the fifth paragraph is meant to support the authors main claim that free wi-fi in cities benefits residents as well as the local economy. whats wrong with the authors argument in the fifth paragraph? the author does not address the fact that many devices come with data plans that do not require wi-fi. the author overstates the ability of municipal wi-fi to ensure childrens safety. the author does not explain how children could be endangered by a lack of municipal wi-fi.

Explanation:

Para apoyar una afirmación, es necesario explicar cómo un factor (en este caso, la falta de Wi - Fi municipal) puede causar un resultado (el peligro para los niños). Si no se explica esta relación, el argumento carece de coherencia lógica.

Answer:

The author does not explain how children could be endangered by a lack of municipal Wi - Fi.